The Wikipedia Knowledge Dump (WikiDumper.org): Hologram Theory

Monday, November 06, 2006

Hologram Theory

The "Hologram Theory," as it relates to 9/11, proposes that no commercial airliners hit the World Trade Center on Sept 11 2001. Proponents of the theory contend that rather than full sized airliners, the World Trade Center was hit by "Cruise" type Missiles which appeared to the naked eye to be airliners through the use of sophisticated hologram technology. Rosalee Grable is one the the theory's leading proponents. One eyewitness described the 'airplane' he saw: "It just disappeared. It disappeared like a, like a, bad special effect. Disappeared right into the building." Eyewitness Accounts. This theory is controversial even among 9/11 researchers.

External links: Fringe Theories Harming 9/11 Truth Movement; Hologram Theory Hologram Theory Overview; 'Ghostplane' - Rosalee Grable; See Also 911 Truth Movement.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Hologram Theory". Link may die if entry is finally removed or merged.

# posted by Cliff Pickover @ 2:36 PM

Comments:

Rosalee Grable never prmoted a "hologram" theory. It's a No Big Boeing theory.

People who debunk her work, and have absolutely no idea what it is about, claim she supports "holograms" - which is a lie.

# posted by

Matrka : 2:53 PM

It just disappeared. It disappeared like a, like a, like his brain right up his ass.

# posted by

Anonymous : 1:22 AM

Who believes this crap. 2 airplanes hit the towers, and that's that!!

# posted by

Anonymous : 6:51 AM

Why take the time and money to create fake airplanes when real ones are readily available?

# posted by

Anonymous : 8:47 AM

I agree, two airplanes did hit the towers. But what kind of airplanes? The conspiracy theories can just go on and on. Have you seen the Penn and Teller video on conspiracy theories? Besides very vulgar language, it's actually fun to watch.

Here:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=AVTKoPK7gaQ

# posted by

Adrian : 10:22 AM

i was in an email list with her when the ideas of Holograms came up

What happened was many of us were trying to figure out some of the anomalies in the video.
At the time we had no reason to consider that some of the videos were manipulated or even FAKED.

TO me NOW there is ample evidence that at least 2 of the videos were altered or even completely fabricated to insert planes.

WHY they were faked i dont know
but this does NOT mean that no-planes hit the towers

THAT conclusion was drawn by people wanting to discredit the movement.

see....

september 11 videos FAKE

I know that Webfairy did some good work on Pentagon research early in 911 research.
Unfortunately she will go down as a disinfo agent

# posted by

batcave911 : 6:28 PM

hologram theory is crap, 9/11 conspiracy is crap

# posted by

Anonymous : 9:26 AM

John Lear says in this interview:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj-HzHi3dF0
(starting at about 0:45:30)

that the planes actually were holograms. He refers to advanced hologram technology which some of his informants had seen in Hollywood in a small demonstration about future TV.

# posted by

Anonymous : 3:14 AM

BTW

The leading proponent of the HOLOGRAM THEORY is u2r2h ... google u2r2h hologram and take note of the actual ONLY VIABLE technical explanation of the technology involved

keywords: u2r2h hologrammes spray phase-conjugate mirrors ("time-reversal" of light), optical cache memories, image processing

more research

thanks for your attention!

# posted by

u2r2h : 3:19 PM

who the fuck cares what hit the buildings, they will make up all kinds of shit conspiricy theories to make peaople confused and not know what to believe in. what maters is being able to think for ourselves,stand up for what we believe in, and take actions instead of just sitting here righting bullshit on blog sites... peace

# posted by

Anonymous : 6:39 AM

The Wikipedia Knowledge Dump (WikiDumper.org)

Monday, November 06, 2006

Hologram Theory

Discuss

News

archives