Monday, November 06, 2006
The "Hologram Theory," as it relates to 9/11, proposes that no commercial airliners hit the World Trade Center on Sept 11 2001. Proponents of the theory contend that rather than full sized airliners, the World Trade Center was hit by "Cruise" type Missiles which appeared to the naked eye to be airliners through the use of sophisticated hologram technology. Rosalee Grable is one the the theory's leading proponents. One eyewitness described the 'airplane' he saw: "It just disappeared. It disappeared like a, like a, bad special effect. Disappeared right into the building." Eyewitness Accounts. This theory is controversial even among 9/11 researchers.GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Hologram Theory". Link may die if entry is finally removed or merged.
People who debunk her work, and have absolutely no idea what it is about, claim she supports "holograms" - which is a lie.
What happened was many of us were trying to figure out some of the anomalies in the video.
At the time we had no reason to consider that some of the videos were manipulated or even FAKED.
TO me NOW there is ample evidence that at least 2 of the videos were altered or even completely fabricated to insert planes.
WHY they were faked i dont know
but this does NOT mean that no-planes hit the towers
THAT conclusion was drawn by people wanting to discredit the movement.
september 11 videos FAKE
I know that Webfairy did some good work on Pentagon research early in 911 research.
Unfortunately she will go down as a disinfo agent
(starting at about 0:45:30)
that the planes actually were holograms. He refers to advanced hologram technology which some of his informants had seen in Hollywood in a small demonstration about future TV.
The leading proponent of the HOLOGRAM THEORY is u2r2h ... google u2r2h hologram and take note of the actual ONLY VIABLE technical explanation of the technology involved
keywords: u2r2h hologrammes spray phase-conjugate mirrors ("time-reversal" of light), optical cache memories, image processing
thanks for your attention!
they never found ANY BODIES from ANY crash... Not the pentagon, not in penns, not in new york...
they also said that the fire in the building was so intense that it melted steel.. I WORK FOR Underwriters Laboratories... Jet fuel COULD NOT melt that steel in those buildings..
and if it was so hot, how did they find one of the terrorists passports "just laying on the ground" intact?
no one knows for sure what happened, but we know what didnt happen..
hologram theory is crap, 9/11 conspiracy is crap
Do some research and you can figure it out for yourself... unless you are so gullible to where you believe whatever is fed to you... you really think a plane brought down a whole building by fire? hahahahaha... that is bullshit...
a b-52 hit the empire state building WAY before the use of fire sprinklers, carrying a full load... why didnt that tower go down? or any other one in history that has burned (that was made of steel, of course..)
then watch this
IF YOU CANNOT SEE THE SIMILARITIES IN THESE VIDEOS, THEN YOU ARE JUST BEING IGNORANT... IT IS VERY OBVIOUS THAT THE TOWERS WERE BROUGHT DOWN IN A CONTROLLED MANNER.... HOW ELSE COULD A PLANE THAT IS A 1/100 THE SIZE OF THAT BUILDING BRING IT DOWN?
that is the 3rd building (building 7) that collasped later that day.. this building was NOT hit with a plane AT ALL..
the governments story:
A burning piece of debris fell from one of the towers, broke a window, started a fire, and brought down building 7 COMPLETELY TO THE GROUND...
you can learn ALOT from not being so closed minded.. you probably believe in god, too...
Go Google it and find out for yourself, surely it would be difficult to 'cover up' so many large buildings collapsing all over the world, after a fire, or even earthquake which can cause far greater structural movement than could be achieved by a dozen planes hitting simultaneously.
Hundreds of other airline pilots, engineers and aerodynamics specialists concour with this, but guess what, tomahawk cruise missles cruise happily at 1000 feet, at by pure coincidents, 500 mph
That and the fact you see a wing disapear for a single frame, and also see an undamaged fuselage emerge (again for only 1or2 frames) before the explosion, from the other side of the tower
Oh please, it was an aweful attempt to coverup, and only some americans actually still believe the official story
The rest of the world sees right through